SRI (Short Ram Intake) and CAI (Cold Air Intake)的区别是什么?
马3比较适合哪一种呢~?
如果要换intake的话..我的是mazda3 哪个intake比较好~?( AEM? K&N? MazdaSpeed? Simota?)
好像一个intake只能加2-5的hp... 那还了intake之后有什么变的不一样了?
换intake会改变引擎声音?
babbybb
新手上路
|
0#
发表于 2010-03-31 15:03
SRI (Short Ram Intake) and CAI (Cold Air Intake)的区别是什么?马3比较适合哪一种呢~?
如果要换intake的话..我的是mazda3 哪个intake比较好~?( AEM? K&N? MazdaSpeed? Simota?)
好像一个intake只能加2-5的hp... 那还了intake之后有什么变的不一样了?
换intake会改变引擎声音?
|
kk_kk
新手上路
|
1#
发表于 2010-03-31 15:55
cold gets more O[size=1]2[/size] ----> burns more fuel in same volume of air ----> more power
short ram more O[size=1]2[/size] at higher speed(50km/h +) ---> burns more fuel in same volume of air at higher speed ---> more power at high speed
warn air is less less O[size=1]2[/size] at any speed ---> burns less fuel ---> lack of power but save lots of fuel
questions like that can be answered in many different way, that IMO. why dont u google it or wiki it?
turn things around, get a cheap CIVIC to mod on ur own, tons of fun and cheap to imply any theory u can have on mind.
|
kk_kk
新手上路
|
2#
发表于 2010-03-31 15:58
personally, i wouldnt bother with cold air as it reach bottom of chassis to get "cold", BC is too wet, too much water, which may cause damage even just water
|
fairladyz
新手上路
|
3#
发表于 2010-03-31 17:01
[quote]引用第2楼kk_kk于2010-03-31 14:58发表的 :
personally, i wouldnt bother with cold air as it reach bottom of chassis to get "cold", BC is too wet, too much water, which may cause damage even just water[/quote]
Go over a puddle water, and next thing you know, hydrolocking. Especially if the car has been lowered.
Quite frankly, adding an intake alone will not add any performance that actuall counts. A typical CAI adds about-----supposedly-----7-10HP, [i]at the crank[/i]. Actual HP gain at the wheels is not significant enough to make your ride any faster.
You may [i]feel[/i] like the car is now faster. And if that's worth $300, so be it.
|
测光
新手上路
|
5#
发表于 2010-03-31 22:59
i like u guys' comments on the intake.
wat do u guys think about spending $1000 for a header? worth the $$$ or not?
thks
|
babbybb
新手上路
|
6#
发表于 2010-03-31 23:30
[quote]引用第1楼kk_kk于2010-03-31 14:55发表的 :
cold gets more O[size=1]2[/size] ----> burns more fuel in same volume of air ----> more power
short ram more O[size=1]2[/size] at higher speed(50km/h +) ---> burns more fuel in same volume of air at higher speed ---> more power at high speed
warn air is less less O[size=1]2[/size] at any speed ---> burns less fuel ---> lack of power but save lots of fuel
.......[/quote]
thx....
|
kk_kk
新手上路
|
7#
发表于 2010-03-31 23:35
[quote]引用第3楼fairladyz于2010-03-31 16:01发表的 :
Go over a puddle water, and next thing you know, hydrolocking. Especially if the car has been lowered.
.......[/quote]
the only benefit i can see the about intakes is just a bit higher air flow rate
|
babbybb
新手上路
|
8#
发表于 2010-03-31 23:35
but i saw a post on bcmazda3 forum~~~
the guy bought a sri.(Simota Carbon Charger for a 2010 Mazda 3 (2.5L engine)
after he installed into his car, the engine sound changed , like deeper.....
[url]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9zmqHcTBrKE[/url]
it that true? he didnt even change exchaust= =
|
kk_kk
新手上路
|
9#
发表于 2010-03-31 23:36
[quote]引用第5楼测光于2010-03-31 21:59发表的 :
i like u guys' comments on the intake.
wat do u guys think about spending $1000 for a header? worth the $$$ or not?
thks[/quote]
i would put on low tone cat-back exhaust , fart can is always nice[s:201]
|
babbybb
新手上路
|
10#
发表于 2010-03-31 23:36
[quote]引用第5楼测光于2010-03-31 21:59发表的 :
i like u guys' comments on the intake.
wat do u guys think about spending $1000 for a header? worth the $$$ or not?
thks[/quote]
what header= = LOL
|
测光
新手上路
|
11#
发表于 2010-03-31 23:56
got catback already, installed it just because of the weight loss, a better look, & a sportier tone of exhaust note
wat do u think about a top notch headers, worth it or forget it? let say a thousand bucks
|
240354
新手上路
|
12#
发表于 2010-04-01 02:08
take off your air filter and run it,
if u dont feel any difference then dont bother with it.
|
4512
新手上路
|
13#
发表于 2010-04-01 02:45
sri和cai肯定是cai进气含氧量更高,进气声音更沉稳
cai可以安装bypass valve防止hydrolock
|
(^_^)
新手上路
|
14#
发表于 2010-04-01 05:39
我这里有一个全新,没开封的马3用的AEM cold air intake。还有专用防水罩
因为还没来得及安装车就丢了。。。
楼主有没有兴趣?
|
(^_^)
新手上路
|
15#
发表于 2010-04-01 05:41
我再买之前也做了好多研究,总体评价AEM算最好的,而且它还有专用防水罩
|
kk_kk
新手上路
|
16#
发表于 2010-04-01 08:25
[quote]引用第11楼测光于2010-03-31 22:56发表的 :
got catback already, installed it just because of the weight loss, a better look, & a sportier tone of exhaust note
wat do u think about a top notch headers, worth it or forget it? let say a thousand bucks[/quote]
its really personal preference. i can tell the difference after installing the header, but u no civic header is cheap to get. for 1G, i wouldnt bother as i value handling more.
|
测光
新手上路
|
17#
发表于 2010-04-01 09:37
ops, the low cost headers range like couple hundred $, the mid range headers are one thousand something $$. however the Maxim / Feel's top notch headers that I want are over two grand $$$. i thought about it for a long time, for 2g, i rather spend the $$$ on AP 4-port bbk, or brembo. stoptech is a bit less than 2g, however, i still like black&yellow AP calipers the best.
|
测光
新手上路
|
18#
发表于 2010-04-01 09:40
babbybb小鬼, SRI (Short Ram Intake) and CAI (Cold Air Intake)的区别是 一個裝在高處﹐一個裝在低處。
|
!!普通人
新手上路
|
19#
发表于 2010-04-01 09:54
[img]http://www.revscene.net/forums/images/smilies/inout.gif[/img]
|
fairladyz
新手上路
|
20#
发表于 2010-04-01 10:32
[quote]引用第19楼!!普通人于2010-04-01 08:54发表的 :
[img]http://www.revscene.net/forums/images/smilies/inout.gif[/img][/quote]
[img]http://findmeazombie.com/Pages/Tar%20man/Images/return-of-the-living-dead-cover-2.jpg[/img]
|